New licensing requirements for virtual-asset service providers in Singapore have quietly changed the terrain for asset-tracing practitioners. Understanding what has shifted – and acting quickly – can mean the difference between a recoverable position and funds that disappear through compliant channels.
Singapore's Monetary Authority of Singapore has tightened the licensing regime for virtual-asset service providers under the Payment Services Act, requiring entities that deal in digital-payment tokens to hold a Major Payment Institution licence. This matters for recovery because licensed VASPs are now subject to defined disclosure obligations, enhanced know-your-customer requirements, and formal channels for responding to legal process – but access to those channels closes the moment a target moves assets to an unlicensed or offshore entity.
This alert sets out what changed, who is most affected, and what practitioners should do next.
What Changed in Singapore's VASP Licensing Regime?
As of early 2026, Singapore has moved from a transitional framework to a fully enforced licensing system for digital-payment token service providers. Entities that previously operated under a temporary exemption must now hold a full Major Payment Institution licence or cease operating. The shift is significant. A licensed VASP in Singapore operates under rules that include transaction monitoring, customer due diligence, and an obligation to respond to lawful disclosure orders.
Licensed VASPs in Singapore are now required to maintain identifiable customer records and are legally obliged to respond to a disclosure order against a VASP issued by a Singapore court. That is a meaningful choke point for follow-the-money investigations. Before enforcement of the licensing rules, the same entity might have operated under lighter-touch obligations, making legal process harder to serve and records harder to compel.
The other side of the change is movement risk. As unlicensed operators exited Singapore, some customers – including those moving illicit value – migrated to offshore VASPs outside Singapore's reach. Asset tracing must account for that migration. A trail that ran through a Singapore-based platform last year may now terminate in a less regulated environment.
Who Is Affected?
The licensing shift directly affects anyone using Singapore as a tracing or enforcement forum. Three groups feel it most acutely.
Defrauded principals whose funds passed through a Singapore-licensed VASP now have clearer access to formal disclosure channels – but only if they move quickly. A Bankers Trust order or a disclosure order against a VASP can compel production of account and transaction records. The window to use those instruments is measured in days once a target becomes aware of proceedings.
Insolvency practitioners tracing assets stripped from an estate may find that a Singapore-licensed VASP holds records on wallet clusters connected to the respondent. We regularly advise practitioners to treat licensed-VASP records as a priority disclosure target early in any tracing exercise.
Referring lawyers and funders assessing viability should note that a Singapore nexus now carries stronger enforcement potential than it did before full licensing was in force. The forum is well-developed, courts respond quickly to urgent freezing applications, and cooperation with local counsel is straightforward. We routinely coordinate proceedings with local counsel in Singapore.
What Should Practitioners Do Now?
Speed is not optional here. In our experience, asset tracing that captures a licensed-VASP trail before funds move offshore recovers significantly more usable evidence than tracing that begins after migration. Three steps apply immediately.
First, identify any Singapore-licensed VASP touchpoint in the transaction chain. On-chain tracing – following wallet addresses across public blockchains – can establish whether funds passed through an entity now subject to Singapore's licensing rules. Blockchain-analytics tools make that attribution possible even when the counterparty used multiple wallets.
Second, preserve the on-chain and off-chain evidence you already have. Timestamps, transaction hashes, and any communication records should be secured before proceedings are contemplated. Singapore courts expect applicants for urgent interim relief to demonstrate that they have preserved what they hold.
Third, assess whether a worldwide freezing order, a proprietary injunction, or a targeted disclosure order against a VASP is the right immediate step. Singapore's courts have handled digital-asset freezing applications and are familiar with the procedural requirements. A without-notice application – made before the target is aware – is the appropriate form where dissipation risk is real. Hours matter at this stage.
The steps above describe the general pattern. Your matter turns on specific facts – where the money is, which VASPs it touched, and how long ago it moved. A confidential case review tells you whether the Singapore route is still viable and what it would take to pursue it. Contact us at info@axiomtracel.com.
For broader context on financial forensics and follow-the-money methodology, see the Financial Forensics insight hub. For a jurisdiction-specific overview of enforcement options, visit our Singapore jurisdiction page. For a parallel alert on regulatory shifts affecting asset recovery in another major hub, see what changed in the UAE for cross-border asset recovery.
About Axiom Trace
Axiom Trace is an independent boutique focused on cross-border and crypto asset recovery. We trace assets that have moved across borders or on-chain and coordinate their freezing and recovery – working with defrauded principals, insolvency practitioners, and the lawyers and funders who refer them. We reconstruct payment trails from partial records, identify where value settled, and coordinate disclosure applications and freezing orders through local counsel where proceedings must be filed. We work lawfully and within applicable sanctions regimes. Where asset tracing leads to a Singapore nexus, we routinely coordinate with local counsel admitted in that jurisdiction. To discuss a matter, contact info@axiomtracel.com.
Disclaimer: This publication is for general information only and is not legal advice, nor a promise or prediction of recovery. No outcome is guaranteed. Asset recovery depends on the specific facts and on the law and procedure of each relevant jurisdiction, where local admitted counsel must act. Axiom Trace assumes no liability for actions taken or not taken based on this material. For advice on your situation, contact info@axiomtracel.com.
Recovering cross-border or crypto assets?
Confidential first review. We map tracing and recovery options and tell you honestly whether a matter is worth pursuing.
Request a case review